This is a an older posting. But imagine, please:
- plant HIGH enough so that MORE people are trapped?
- The white house knew about EXPLOSIVES? but never mentioned it?
Boy, the Bushs were shaking in their boots. The "collapse" was way too obviously a demolition. Yet, the story went away, nobody dared to become a heretic. 10 years later... we let the pentagon rule the world.
16 August, 2007
Bush TELLS of planted EXPLOSIVES INSIDE THE WTC!
Submitted by u2r2h on Sat, 09/16/2006 - 7:01pm.
Bush TELLS of planted EXPLOSIVES INSIDE THE WTC!
500kB mp3 audio snippet (broadcast quality, wink, nod, prod, hint)
For Immediate Release -- Office of the Press Secretary -- September 15, 2006 -- Press Conference of the President -- The Rose Garden -- President's Remarks -- 11:15 A.M. EDT
Blah blah ...we need to torture, because...
Bush: For example, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed described the design of planned attacks of buildings inside the U.S. and how operatives were directed to carry them out. That is valuable information for those of us who have the responsibility to protect the American people. He told us the operatives had been instructed to ensure that the explosives went off at a high -- a point that was high enough to prevent people trapped above from escaping.
Bush HESITATES twice and gives away more than he is saying... he uses REVERSE LOGIC.. if the explosives are planted HIGH in the building.. there are LESS floors above where people can get trapped. i.e. If the OPERATIVES wanted to MINIMIZE the bloodbath they would WANT TO plant explosives HIGH in the building.
Also, WHY is this valuable information? Since nobody in the Bush admin did anything to prevent it, the VALUE of the information could only illustrate how negligent the Bush admin was. But this is a red herring anyway! The Bush junta is starting to COVER ITS ARSE ... My guess is that Bush's handlers have instructed Shrub to GIVE A CODED WARNING to the operatives that there are documents to be released which will EXPOSE and confirm the use of explosives... they are giving out the DIRECTIVE FOR SPIN:
- The "operatives" planted explosives... how ludicrous is that? Arabs planting tons of explosives! and oooh hooo.. SUDDENLY we discoverd that it was NOT JUST THE FUEL that brought the towers down and slaughtered 3000 New Yorkers... maybe they will also give medals to 911-truthers that HELPED to UNCOVER THIS EVIL PLOT.
its on youtube, search for
Rose Garden Bush Explosives
Here are the references. ... look: http://news.google.com/news?q=%22%20TO%20ENSURE%20THAT%20THE%20EXPLOSIVE...
The whitehouse website transcript: http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2006/09/20060915-2.html
REAL VIDEO: http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2006/09/20060915-2.v.html
NETTRANSPORT capture stream: rtsp://a257.v5913b.c5913.g.vr.akamaistream.net/ondemand/7/257/
At least now we can all say:
The president implied that explosives brought the towers down.
Stunning! I think you guys may not realize what that means!
Every foreign leader can now ask:
How much explosives?
How did the explosives get there?
Why do we hear this 5 years after?
Is the FBI in a coma?
Two issues here, Bush's statement and patsy-ness:
A) Regarding his statement, this could be construed to mean "that the planes hit" high up, but he did specifically say "exploSIVES", not "exploSIONS". I think that's some major leakage in the S.S. New World Order.
B) Even Kerry-voters and worse know that Bush is just a talking head who can barely tie his own shoes (at least, that's all he's allowed to be for the NWO role-play he's bonded to, but that that's a role he's forced into basically all the time), so offering Bush as a patsy would, across the board, be the most significantly provocative action the planners could take. If they said that it wasn't Al-Qaida, that it was Bush, people would reject this out of hand and begin to question who it really was, and who it really is behind the presidency and the rest of it.
And then it's open season on the invisible government exposure project.
Submitted by A. Nonymous (not verified) on Mon, 09/18/2006 - 11:26pm
Like i predicted and warned about many months ago:
U.S. Gov will link Controlled Demolition/Thermite to Al-Quaeda.
That's also why they officially moved "KSM" to Gitmo.
To 'kill' him and the final spin.
This is where the orwellian movement is setting up itself.
Don't believe the hype :(
Submitted by ewing2001 on Sat, 09/16/2006 - 7:30pm
People have been speculating this for years
that when it got too hot to handle, they would switch to al-Qaeda bombed the buildings. I was just wondering yesterday when they would start with that.
Submitted by YT on Sat, 09/16/2006 - 8:02pm.
there is no way they can spin 180 and not point directly at themselves.
"Yeah, see AlQueda put bombs in the buildings, and see well the 9/11 Commision, NIST and FEMA have been playing along in our plan to expose them for this horrible act!"
Ahhh, makes no sense to reverse explosives in the buildings with terrorists, maybe a week or so after 9/11 but not 5 years later.
Submitted by imgstacke on Sat, 09/16/2006 - 8:14pm
I'm surprised after this amount of time since Bush made that announcement there hasn't been that much of stir. I find that statement totally out of the normal rules for government lies. The Washington I know, stays the course, never waiver, stick to the lie. indeed I do believe they're setting the stage to blame the ragheads. It really doesn't matter what the lie is or how ridiculous it sounds comming from Washington, Who is going to do anything about it anyway? Washington has always been a lousy liar, never could tell a decent lie. Governments that investigate theirselves get that way. Like Oswald and Oswald alone killed the President. The only way you tell a lie in Washington is if THE WHOLE GOVERNMENT approves it.
Submitted by Duane M Thomas (not verified) on Mon, 11/13/2006 - 6:17am.
I disagree. They will have no choice when it becomes more apparent that explosives were used. But they can always say "gee, isn't that interesting. I guess they were alot smarter then we thought. Well have to look into this and get back to you - say never"Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 09/19/2006 - 5:29pm.
Submitted by ewing2001 on Sun, 09/17/2006 - 2:14pm.
this is the first mention of Al Quaeda planting bombs high up in U.S. buildings. Kind of a major piece of information for Bush to drop so casually. Don't blame the Truth Movement for seizing on it. This is the so-called "leader" of the free world! Why the hell else would he be bringing this up?
Don't be so quick to dump on the truth seekers unless you have some other plausible explanation for this sudden piece of MAJOR news about the so-called "terrist".
Submitted by Chris Rose on Sat, 09/16/2006 - 8:46pm.
There is no such word as "conspirist", and if there were, it would mean the same as "conspirator", i.e., one who conspires. Your attempt to link all who find the official story ludicrous won't wash here. Probably not even in Canada.The official story - that 19 middle eastern men, under the control of a very ill man on a kidney dialysis machine in a cave in Afghanistan, who lived with FBI agents, attended flight schools at Pensacola Naval Air Station and the Defense Language School in Monterrey, California - is the most enormous conspiracy theory of them all. Guess that make YOU a "conspirist", whatever that is.
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Mon, 09/18/2006 - 5:09pm.
Here is a video from USA Today offices outside DC (a view of the Pentagon burning in the background) in which reporter says he's just come from the FBI and their working theory on the Towers is that they were brought down by truck bombs parked in the basement. NO KIDDING:
http://terrorize.dk truck bombs.fbi.jack.kelley.rm
It's also what Van Romero initially figured, before he "changed his mind."
Then we also have Willie Rodriguez saying he saw one of the hijckers hanging around the WTC.
The "terrorists blew up the Towers" idea has been around for years.
Submitted by Nicholas (unlogged) (not verified) on Sat, 09/16/2006 - 10:38pm.
I think it is very IMPORTANT to tell us what EXPLOSIVES! I know of no other building that would fit this statement. The PRESS has to "press" for ANSWERS!
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 09/19/2006 - 1:59am.
I have tried and tried and tried to get someone to listen to me that I was a mile and a half from the Pentagon that morning, and I SAW the freakin' missile pass overhead. I heard not one, but three concussions. I'm a carpenter, and I was working outdoors on a garage BELONGING TO A RETIRED AIR FORCE PILOT, so my testimony is quite verifyable.
As I was setting up my tools for the day's work, I caught the first report of a plane hitting the WTC, and I was concerned for a friend who flies frequently, so I went in where, in the morning, the t.v. was always on. It wasn't, that morning, but it was after I gave my report. So I was pretty much on top of all of it. Not only that, but one of my brothers was an archetect and worked on high-rise buildings, so I have some knowledge of structure, and also demolition. I knew immediately something was not right about this incident, and have been a truther ever since.
It has taken five years for all the little details to trickle out for those of us who have relentlessly researched this since 9/11/01. Indeed, we all saw the onslaught of spin start when Press For Truth came out, and it's been heating up ever since. Incidently, I sponcered a viewing, and I'm still at my Brave New Theaters web site. Roy Stokes.
If it's trace-able, in my early days on the few web sites available, I signed on as "tmswyr".
Thanks for the article. More facts...and spin...are about to unfold; get those trays in the up-right, locked possition.
Submitted by royster (not verified) on Sun, 09/17/2006 - 7:43am.
I arrived at the job site that morning at 8:00. I'm self employed, so no one was with me. I can give exact coordinates to where I was and see if this validates my claim. (Specificly, Lloyds Lane and Between Braddock Road and Russell Road, Alexandria.) I've never looked. I can also validate an F-16 flying overhead well over an hour past the incident (my client would obviously know what an F-16 is, but I couldn't have told you.)
In fact, I had no idea what I saw was a missle; I only knew it sounded funny, and looked obviously military. It was well over two weeks when I saw just such a missle, with the same sound, on t.v.. I have been trying to schedule hypnotic regression locally, and will make the results public when it happens.
Surely my client, an Air Force Col., would have heard the engine. My relation with him turned very sour two days later when I told him I was certain that this was done by American and British interests, but I've since learned the power of supena (sp?).
Submitted by royster (not verified) on Sun, 09/17/2006 - 3:32pm
I also saved many media articles from that day and two years beyond. In fact, I sent a copy of my local newspaper's own copy which shows the "plane" about to hit the 2nd tower, fully showing the bulge, along with that month's letter to the editor THREE YEARS LATER (because I had saved it)(I get to publish one per month)and that newspaper is The Northern Virginia Daily.
I have an incriminating copy of Newsweeks' "special report", which is dated September 14, 2001, yet it was much too complete (for the time) to be on the newstand I bought it from on September 13. If the FBI raids my house and takes all of this evidence, it isstill available to the public.
Last, but not least, I kept newspaper clippings of a suspicious group of men who one day were jublilant Iraqis at the pulling down of the statue (Saddam) and a day or so later...lo n' behold!...they're in Iraqi military uniforms. I suspect they were Chalibi's minions.
The Northern Virginia Daily has never ONCE not printed my letters, and I conveyed to this community 9/11 facts a couple of years back when it was quite a risk to do so.
Submitted by roystert (not verified) on Sun, 09/17/2006 - 3:50pm.
Any seasoned 9/11 researcher knew two years ago about the documentd fact that the towers were "powered down" shortly before 9/11, alledgedly for "upgrading cable" for computers. This occurred from the 50th floor on up. That means there were NO SURVEILANCE CAMERAS operating, minimal security, which...oh-muh-GAWD!...Marvin Bush not only knew about it, he authorised it.
In one of my more creative moments, I wondered; how many survivors noticed soda machines suddenly appearing in unusual places? Just a thought.
As for the obvious full-floor flash of fire 1/3 of the way down, you cannot convince me a commercial aircrafte is going to hit a building at circa 300 mph, spew most of the fuel...probably also traveling at the same speed, one could only suppose...and enough of it is going to a) remain in the structure long enough to "bend steel" (I heat with kerosine in the winter, people, and why doesn't it "bend" jet engines?) b.)"trickle down the stairwells", yet not ignite from the original fire? (I live in the country; I do controlled burns all the time.) and c.) blow steel girders upward and outward 100 feet? Kerosine is not that explosive, and commercial aircraft jet fuel is a high grade of kerosine; a non-stoiciometrical hydrocarbon?
And who DID shoot J.R.?
One more note; my commute to work in Alexandria id 90 miles, just in case you want to split hairs on the details. And the Col. I speak of most assuridy is in the phone book.
Submitted by royster (not verified) on Sun, 09/17/2006 - 7:03pm.
HERE are more comments ... some of them are thoughful!!
It took a while, but 911blogger added this story to the front page...
But they HAD TO make a new story... my headline was probably too strong.
Right, We have to stay fair and balanced on 911blogger.com .. we must not allow the great unwashed to think that Bush DID plant explosives... (overlooking the colon)
2 more things:
nobody has said anything to the CODED WARNING idea...
Will we let this story die a quiet death?
Can someone please FAX a few questions to the White House and get them to weasle out of the THE ISSUE?