Dr. Judy Wood, a professor at Clemson University with degrees in civil engineering, engineering mechanics, and materials engineering science, asked after the 9/11 catastrophe: How did two of the world's tallest buildings all but disappear, and faster than traditional physics can explain?
Over a half mile of vertical building height, containing nearly 150 football fields of floor space, was reduced to a near-level field of dust and debris, where rescue workers walked horizontally or rappelled into empty caverns to look for survivors. How was this possible given the standard laws of engineering and physics?
The 9/11 Commission Report bypassed this central issue, as did the report of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Contrary to its stated objective of determining "why and how WTC 1 and WTC 2 collapsed," the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) made the stunning admission that it did not investigate how the towers fell.
Neither the standard view-that the Twin Towers collapsed from fire-nor the standard opposition view-that they were intentionally detonated by "thermite explosives"- explains the evidence, nor do they follow the laws of engineering and physics.
Dr. Wood left Clemson to research the 9/11 conundrum full time, and she has focused her research strictly on physical evidence and scientific principles. Where Did the Towers Go? provides an understandable, credible, and photo-enhanced summary of Dr. Wood's disturbing findings, which resulted in her lawsuit against the contractors of the NIST report.
wtc collapse it aint. It is a veritable dustification
Revaluation Books (Exeter, DEV, United Kingdom)
240 pages. In Stock. Delivery: UK usually 4-5 days, Europe/USA/ROW 7-10 days- Paperback: 240 pages
- Publisher: Feral House
- Language: English
- ISBN-10: 1932595473
- ISBN-13: 978-1932595475
Where did the towers go? : the evidence of directed energy technology on 9/11
Author: Judy D Wood
Publisher: Los Angeles, Calif. : Feral House ; London : Turnaround [distributor], 2009.
Edition/Format: Book : English
where did 110 storeys go? Got it now?
ONE ignoramus REVIEW on AMAZON CANADA
Do not waste your time, Sep 14 2009 By Jason M. Wood (Ontario, Canada)
Dr. Wood fails to explain how the perpetrators came up with the 5.7 x 10^13 watts of energy required to vapourize the steel in the World Trade Center. That's over 5 times the total energy output of the entire earth, and it assumes 100% efficiency. The actual requirement would likely be thousands of times the earth's total energy output.
So this is just a ridiculous claim, plain and simple, and we don't even need to look at Dr. Wood's other silly arguments.
WHAT JASON fails to realize is that there is other explanations. Mrs Wood doesn't need to speculate, she just DESCRIBES what happened.
Dismissal is short and easy. Knowledge is long and hard.
2 comments:
...AND the Towers are gone, aren't they? So there WAS enough energy to dustify the complex! Your own claim that it was something else is the highly ridiculous one. You've obviously not read her work but just enjoy rendering your quick and easy opinion. Feels very comforting, doesn't it? However, "Truth is exact correspondence with reality."
...And besides, Dr. Wood has never suggested vaporisation occurred; there is a world of a difference between vaporisation (implying a gaseous state resulted) and pulverisation/dustification (implying that matter remained in a solid state). The amount of energy required to achieve the latter is FAR less. People forget that smoke is still a solid not a gas.
Post a Comment